Julius Ceasar

I think both speeches are similar in pathos wise, because they both get really emotional and they get to the people, making them believe what they are saying and try to get them to their side. And people actually do, for example when Brutus talked, they thought that Caesar died for a good reason, so everything was fine, but then when Antony started talking about how good of a person Ceasar was, people just wanted revenge against the ones that killed him.

Talking about logos, i think that Antony has more proves about what he was saying because he could explain them the reasons why he was a good person, and even showed them his will, and everything that he was leaving to them. But Brutus didn't have any proves to say that Ceasar was ambitious, he just said that he was and that's why he deserved to die.

About ethos, at the beginning Brutus' speech had a lot of moral credibility, because people thought that was an honorable man, so that's why they should trust him. But then after Ceaser's speech, they realized that they were actually against Ceasar's death, because he didn't deserve it.